January 26, 2024
Argentina & Chile: A Tale of Two
Countries
Drone image from Colbun energy storage site in
Chile. Image courtesy of Wärtsilä.
Mimicking renewable policies is the highest form of flattery
While not
traditionally held up as a pinnacle of renewable energy development,
Chile has quietly become a leader in South America for developing
environmental policy and attracting renewable investment. With the
amount of solar and wind energy eclipsing coal for the first time in
its history and a populace that is perhaps the most environmentally
friendly in the world, Chile has set lofty renewable energy goals and
is poised to meet them.
Unfortunately,
Chile’s neighbor to the east cannot say the same. Argentina’s reliance
on oil and natural gas, its outdated electric grid, and its
undesirable investment climate have resulted in a sluggish transition
to green energy and a continued dependence on carbon-heavy energy
sources. The two countries share similar degrees of renewable
potential due to their landscape, but one has succeeded and the other
seems unable to move forward. Argentina must look to Chile’s last
twenty years for guidance, and to its own last twenty years as a
warning.
Everything, at
least in the renewable energy world, seems to favor Chile. In a study
about
public opinion on climate change,
93% of respondents in Chile reported that they were either “somewhat
worried” or “very worried” about climate change. Similarly, 80% of
respondents said that climate change would hurt future generations “a
great deal.” These were the second highest rates for both questions
among the 192 countries and territories. Strong public opinion is
compounded by the success that Chile has had in solar and wind
development. From August 2021 to September 2022, Chile produced a
higher share of its electricity from solar and wind than coal, marking
the first time in its history. Public opinion and success of
renewables have encouraged the government to make ever stronger
commitments. This includes a pledge to be carbon neutral by 2050 at
the latest, and power generation companies have agreed to close
thermal power plants by 2040.
Chile has many
of the same resources as Argentina. Atacama and Antofagasta, home to
many of the largest solar PV plants in Chile, are located in the arid
northern region. This is a similar climate to the north of Argentina,
yet Chile has so far seen a much more appropriate use of its
resources. The wind energy potential in Chile and Argentina are
similar, but once again Chile has taken advantage of its resources,
while Argentina has not. Wind energy accounted for only 3.5% of
electricity generation in Argentina, despite 300 GW of potential and
excellent
wind speeds in the south. Chile, on the other hand, boasts 9% of
its power consumption from wind energy.
When asked
about the roadblocks to further development of Argentinian renewables,
reporters and industry leaders in the country most often mentioned
inadequate grid infrastructure associated with the length of the
country. Proponents struggle on how best to transport energy created
in the solar and wind farms in the far north and south of the country
to population centers in the center. However, Chile has a fully
privatized energy generation and distribution network, stemming from
the strong economic growth of the last 20 years, which has provided an
ideal investment atmosphere. By contrast, Argentina’s economic
instability deters outside investment, as do the extraordinary levels
of inflation. Argentina was also blessed, or in this case, cursed,
with massive reserves of both oil and natural gas. In 2022, Argentina
exported more oil than ever before, thanks in large part to new
excavations of the Vaca Muerta deposits. Unfortunately, Argentina
continues to heavily subsidize its oil industry. In fact, 2020 saw
Argentina invest 90 times more capital in fossil fuel programs than in
renewable energy initiatives. This effectively hamstrings Argentina’s
fledgling renewables industries, as they are now not only competing
with oil and natural gas, but also with a government that is more
dedicated to promoting the interests of these carbon energies.
It would be
difficult to find two neighboring countries with such different
approaches to renewable energy. While both are capable of providing
vast amounts of both solar and wind power, Chile has a population that
is highly supportive, a government that is championing renewable
policies, and an economy that is attracting investment from global
sources. Argentina, by contrast, continues to rely on its vast supply
of oil and natural gas to boost an economy that is suffering from
severe inflation. As far as renewables are concerned, Chile is on the
right side of history.
Green Play Ammonia™, Yielder® NFuel Energy.
Spokane, Washington. 99212
509 995 1879
Cell, Pacific Time Zone.
General office:
509-254
6854
4501 East Trent
Ave.
Spokane, WA 99212
|