|
20 June 2023
by Leigh Collins
Producing green hydrogen only when
wind and solar power
is available would be cheaper than 24/7 operation': study
Lower capital costs for renewables & storage
and longer lifespan of H2 equipment
will offset the latter's higher initial capex, according to scientific
paper
The widely accepted view that electrolysers need
to operate as close to 24 hours a day seven days a week as possible to
produce green hydrogen at the lowest possible cost is false, according
to a new scientific study.
A team led by Stanford University professor Mark
Z Jacobson found that the lowest-cost renewable H2 in 2035, assuming a
100% renewables electricity grid, will be produced with an optimum
electrolyser use factor — ie, the amount of energy consumed annually
compared to the theoretical maximum — of between 20% and 65%,
depending on location and use cases.
“From a business point of view, rectifiers [to
convert AC to DC electricity], electrolyzers, and compressors should
be operated full time (with a use factor of unity [ie, 100%]) to
minimize cost,” Jacobson and colleagues write in the Smart Energy
journal.
“However, we hypothesize that, at high WWS [wind-water-solar]
penetrations and hydrogen penetrations, running this equipment
intermittently (with sub-unity use factors) reduces overall system
cost.”
The study goes on to explain that “the nameplate capacities of
rectifiers, electrolyzers, and compressors must be increased to ensure
the same annual quantity of hydrogen is produced as with a unity use
factor” and that “higher nameplate capacities mean higher capital
costs”.
But it adds: “Fortunately, the impact of higher capital costs on
overall hydrogen cost is largely offset by the longer lifetimes of
rectifiers, electrolyzers, and compressors with lower use factors.”
In other words, the cost of buying the equipment can be amortised over
a longer period of time, thus reducing the levelised cost of green
hydrogen (ie, the per-kilogram cost of H2 over a project's lifetime,
including all upfront and operating expenses).
The paper adds that reducing the amount of time
H2 equipment is in operation also means that fewer solar panels and/or
wind turbines would be needed, as well as smaller volumes of hydrogen
storage — and no battery storage to keep equipment operating when the
wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.
“Additional cost is offset because, either a lower nameplate capacity
of wind and solar or less hydrogen storage is needed with a lower use
factor,” it explains.
“In sum, the lowest cost of hydrogen production integrated with 100%
WWS occurs at a hydrogen-equipment use factor below unity, between 0.2
and 0.65 [ie, 20-65%] in the test cases provided.
“As such, it is more cost-effective from an overall system perspective
to produce hydrogen intermittently rather than continuously. The
results here are subject to model uncertainties, but [the] conclusion
appears robust.”
The study — entitled Impacts of green hydrogen for steel, ammonia, and
long-distance transport on the cost of meeting electricity, heat,
cold, and hydrogen demand in 145 countries running on 100%
wind-water-solar — concludes that using dedicated renewables projects
solely for hydrogen production means that wind, water or solar power
generators “cannot be called upon to provide grid electricity, heat,
or cold in a time of high electricity, heat, or cold demand or low
overall WWS supply, increasing the need for electricity and heat
storage”.
“Economies of scale suggests that interconnecting
all WWS generators and adding loads (such as green hydrogen
production) that can absorb excess electricity, results in the most
cost-effective system.
“Thus, grid operators should incorporate intermittent green hydrogen
production in grid planning.”
Assumptions
As the extremely long title of the paper implies, the study was based
around the amount of renewable electricity and electrolysis that would
be required to meet the global demand in 2050 for green hydrogen from
three sectors — steel, ammonia and long-distance transport (including,
controversially, all aviation and shipping) — which it put at 78.7
million tonnes, 31.7 million tonnes and 91.2 million tonnes a year,
respectively, requiring a peak renewable power demand of 7,057GW
(including its use to compress H2) and 6,212GW of electrolysers.
The 145 countries are responsible for more than 99.7% of global
fossil-fuel emissions.
Jacobson et al argue in the paper that biofuel and synthetic aviation
fuel are not valid decarbonisation methods for ships or airplanes
because they still produce gases and particles that are bad for human
health and/or the planet.
“Despite the challenges of implementing green
hydrogen for long-distance aircraft and ships, it is important to
evaluate this solution because no other clean, renewable energy
solution is on the horizon,” they write.
Jacobson is no stranger to controversy, having previously co-authored
a study claiming that blue hydrogen was worse for the planet than
natural gas, which was based on upstream US methane emissions,
prompting companies in Europe, where such emissions are far lower, to
claim it was misleading. He also attempted to sue the publisher and
authors of a 2017 paper that criticized a previous study he had
written, causing outrage among academics. Jacobson eventually dropped
his lawsuit but was faced with a six-figure bill for legal
costs.(Copyright)
Green Play Ammonia™, Yielder® NFuel Energy.
Spokane, Washington. 99212
509 995 1879
Cell, Pacific Time Zone.
General office:
509-254
6854
4501 East Trent
Ave.
Spokane, WA 99212
|
