Europe’s
biggest oil major, Shell PLC, secretly ditched its plan to spend $100
million a year on carbon credits, which is the largest offset program
among corporations, after 6 months its new chief executive officer
Wael Sawan took office.
In June, Sawan
announced a major
shift in Shell’s strategy –
to maintain its current level of oil production until 2030, not to
reduce it as initially declared, while reducing costs and increasing
shareholders profits.
What the CEO
missed to reveal at the time is the energy giant’s plans for investing
in carbon
credit projects. These credits are part of Shell’s offsetting
program in line with its 2050net
zero emissions goal.
Finding Carbon Offsets that Meet Quality Standards
Shell has made
a commitment to cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50%
by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. It managed toreduce
total emissions from all scopes (Scope 1, 2, and 3) in 2022
compared to 2016 levels.
At a glance,
here’s Shell’s climate target summary with actual achievements in
2022.
A big part of
the oil major’s carbon reduction strategy is the use of carbon credits
to offset emissions.
Originally,
Shell aimed at spending $100
million each
year on carbon offsets. The oil company also targeted to generate120
million carbon
credits yearly by 2030 from natural carbon sequestration projects.
These targets would have offset about10% of
Shell’s carbon emissions.
But with the
company’s recent revelation, they confirmed that they’re putting an
end to those plans. However, the company hasn’t revealed publicly any
new plans for carbon credits or how they now intend to meet their
climate targets.
According to
Shell, those prior goals weren’t attainable due to the lack of carbon
offsets that meet its quality standards.
Carbon offsets
from nature-based
projects were criticized for not delivering the environmental
benefits they promised to bring.
Shell’s
previous intent to build a robust pipeline of carbon credits was
inspired by research saying that nature-based sequestration can suck
in enough carbon to limit global temperature rise. This finding and
the growing pressure for corporations to reduce their carbon emissions
prompted Shell to consider carbon offsets.
Meanwhile,
other large companies and Shell’s oil major peers are also relying on
carbon credits to offset their unabated emissions. Estimates show that
the voluntary
carbon market can hit$950
billion by 2037,
a whopping increase from today’s $2B value.
But the Royal
Dutch oil giant has been struggling to find carbon offsets that meet
its stringent quality requirements.
As per Flora
Ji, a veteran handling the firm’s nature-based solutions (NBS), the
market didn’t put high regard to quality before. She further said
that:
“The quality,
integrity and responsible use of credits: these are the prerequisites
to the credibility and sustainability of the carbon markets.”
Recently, key carbon standard organizations have published a fundamental
framework that defines high-quality carbon credits.
Hitting Shell’s Net Zero Target
Shell is known
to employ strict standards when it comes to developing and investing
in nature-based
climate solutions. The oil major has been supporting diverse NBS
initiatives from reducing deforestation to tree planting to grasslands
projects.
While Shell is
a large supporter of carbon offsets, it’s not the only major player in
the field. Other oil giants have also started to develop their own
carbon credit projects and pipelines. Chevron, TotalEnergies, BP,
Equinor, and Eni are some of the major companies investing in carbon
offset credits.
However, it’s
not clear if they will follow the same offsetting scale that Shell
originally planned.
In comparison,
French oil major TotalEnergies was able to earn less than 7
million credits last year. The company seeks to generate 45
million carbon credits by the end of the decade. That’s only about ⅓
of Shell’s obsolete offsets target.
Despite the
move to ditch its carbon offsets goal, Shell remains committed to its
net zero emissions target. In fact, the company’s spokesman remarked
that their “sustainability and climate targets remain”.
As what Ji has
also confirmed, Shell’s long-term approach to carbon reduction toward
net zero follows the Science-Based
Targets initiative. That means avoiding emissions first and
reducing them before resorting to carbon offsets.
If Shell stays
loyal to its net zero pledge, it will still need carbon offsets
eventually, according to BloombergNEF analysis. The Dutch energy giant
will be needing the offset credits for the residual emissions on its
way to net zero.
Indeed, Shell
is not totally abandoning its carbon offset efforts; only the $100M
and 120M credit targets. Ji noted that the oil major may buy
carbon credits from the VCM to increase its stocks of offsets.
And though
it’s prioritizing its short-term goal of maximizing profits, it has
yet to disclose new plans for its long-term climate targets.
This revealing
news leaves a major question to many – what comes next for Shell’s
carbon emission reduction strategy? Will it pivot to technological
carbon removal instead? That’s what speculators have to watch out
for.
Green Play Ammonia™, Yielder® NFuel Energy.
Spokane, Washington. 99212 509 995 1879
Cell, Pacific Time Zone. General office:
509-254
6854