DARTMOUTH
14
August 2023
By
Dartmouth College
Irrigating more U.S. crops by
mid-century will be worth the investment, researchers say
U.S. map of projected change in crop irrigation
value for corn and soybeans by the middle of the 21st century with
currently irrigated areas outlined in black. Credit: Trevor Partridge
et al.
With climate change, irrigating more crops in the United States
will be critical to sustaining future yields, as drought conditions
are likely to increase due to warmer temperatures and shifting
precipitation patterns. Yet less than 20% of croplands are equipped
for irrigation.
A Dartmouth-led study finds that by the middle of the 21st
century under a moderate greenhouse gas emissions scenario, the
benefits of expanded irrigation will outweigh the costs of
installation and operation over an expanded portion of current U.S.
croplands.
The results show that by mid-century corn and soybeans that are
currently rainfed would benefit from irrigation in most of North
Dakota, eastern South Dakota, western Minnesota, Wisconsin, and
Michigan. Soybean farmland that relies on rain throughout parts of
Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, Kansas, and Oklahoma would also
benefit from irrigation. The findings are published in Communications
Earth & Environment.
Installing, maintaining, and running irrigation equipment comes
at a significant cost to farmers, as much as $160 per acre per year.
"Our work essentially creates a U.S. map of where it will make the
most sense to install and use irrigation equipment for corn and
soybean crops in the future," says first author Trevor Partridge, a
Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow and research hydrologist with the U.S.
Geological Survey Water Resources Mission Area, who conducted the
study while working on his Ph.D. at Dartmouth.
The High Plains region, including Nebraska, Kansas, and
northern Texas, has historically been one of the most heavily
irrigated areas, and was found to have the highest current economic
returns for irrigation. However, the increasing costs of drought are
pushing farmers to invest in irrigation throughout regions of the Corn
Belt and southeastern U.S., and the long-term economic return on these
investments is difficult to predict.
To conduct the cost-benefit analysis of irrigating corn and
soybeans, the researchers ran a series of crop model simulations. They
applied several global climate projections that span the range of
potential future climates—hot and dry, hot and wet, cool and dry, cool
and wet, each relative to the average climate projection—to simulate
future crop growth under fully irrigated or rain-fed conditions.
For each climate scenario, the crop model was run for both corn
and soybeans across all cultivated areas in the U.S. The crop model
simulations examined three periods: historical (1981–2010),
mid-century (2036–2065), and end-of-century (2071–2100) under moderate
and high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. The simulations factored
in county-level crop management and growth data from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistical Service,
including planting, maturity, and harvest dates.
To determine the economic benefits of irrigating—the team
calculated the additional simulated crop yield from irrigating and the
corresponding increased market value that could be expected—relative
to the irrigation costs, which included the electricity required to
pump groundwater and distribute it over the field, and associated
expenses per acre to own and operate the irrigation system.
The team investigated not only where and when it makes sense to
install irrigation for corn and soybeans but also if there will be
enough water to do so. They calculated the "irrigation water deficit,"
which is the simple difference between how much water is applied to
the field relative to how much water should be available for
irrigation.
U.S. map of projected change in crop irrigation
value for corn and soybeans by the middle of the 21st century with
currently irrigated areas outlined in black. Credit: Trevor Partridge
et al.
With climate change, irrigating more crops in the United States
will be critical to sustaining future yields, as drought conditions
are likely to increase due to warmer temperatures and shifting
precipitation patterns. Yet less than 20% of croplands are equipped
for irrigation.
A Dartmouth-led study finds that by the middle of the 21st
century under a moderate greenhouse gas emissions scenario, the
benefits of expanded irrigation will outweigh the costs of
installation and operation over an expanded portion of current U.S.
croplands.
The results show that by mid-century corn and soybeans that are
currently rainfed would benefit from irrigation in most of North
Dakota, eastern South Dakota, western Minnesota, Wisconsin, and
Michigan. Soybean farmland that relies on rain throughout parts of
Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, Kansas, and Oklahoma would also
benefit from irrigation. The findings are published in Communications
Earth & Environment.
Installing, maintaining, and running irrigation equipment comes
at a significant cost to farmers, as much as $160 per acre per year.
"Our work essentially creates a U.S. map of where it will make the
most sense to install and use irrigation equipment for corn and
soybean crops in the future," says first author Trevor Partridge, a
Mendenhall Postdoctoral Fellow and research hydrologist with the U.S.
Geological Survey Water Resources Mission Area, who conducted the
study while working on his Ph.D. at Dartmouth.
The High Plains region, including Nebraska, Kansas, and
northern Texas, has historically been one of the most heavily
irrigated areas, and was found to have the highest current economic
returns for irrigation. However, the increasing costs of drought are
pushing farmers to invest in irrigation throughout regions of the Corn
Belt and southeastern U.S., and the long-term economic return on these
investments is difficult to predict.
To conduct the cost-benefit analysis of irrigating corn and
soybeans, the researchers ran a series of crop model simulations. They
applied several global climate projections that span the range of
potential future climates—hot and dry, hot and wet, cool and dry, cool
and wet, each relative to the average climate projection—to simulate
future crop growth under fully irrigated or rain-fed conditions.
For each climate scenario, the crop model was run for both corn
and soybeans across all cultivated areas in the U.S. The crop model
simulations examined three periods: historical (1981–2010),
mid-century (2036–2065), and end-of-century (2071–2100) under moderate
and high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. The simulations factored
in county-level crop management and growth data from the U.S.
Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistical Service,
including planting, maturity, and harvest dates.
To determine the economic benefits of irrigating—the team
calculated the additional simulated crop yield from irrigating and the
corresponding increased market value that could be expected—relative
to the irrigation costs, which included the electricity required to
pump groundwater and distribute it over the field, and associated
expenses per acre to own and operate the irrigation system.
The team investigated not only where and when it makes sense to
install irrigation for corn and soybeans but also if there will be
enough water to do so. They calculated the "irrigation water deficit,"
which is the simple difference between how much water is applied to
the field relative to how much water should be available for
irrigation.
U.S. map of projected mid-century irrigation
groundwater deficit—the volumetric difference between irrigated water
and available water—with currently irrigated corn and soybean areas
outlined in black. Credit: Trevor Partridge et al.
The results show that by mid-century there will likely be
enough water to irrigate soybeans in Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio, and
northern Illinois and Indiana, but not corn. Iowa is the largest
producer of corn in the U.S. groundwater resources for irrigation were
found to be the most abundant in the southeast U.S., especially in the
lower Mississippi Valley where agriculture is less intensive. However,
in this region the benefits of irrigation are minimal.
"Our results suggest that there is relatively little overlap
between where there is enough water to fully irrigate crops without
placing additional stress on water resources and where farmers can
expect the investment in irrigation to pay for itself over the long
term, " says Partridge.
For example, the Ogallala Aquifer in the Great Plains is the
largest aquifer in the U.S., providing water to eight states, and
supports one the most extensively irrigated areas for corn and
soybeans.
"The increasing benefits of irrigation, could incentivize
farmers to use more water, which will place additional stress on key
aquifers, including the Ogallala," says senior author Jonathan Winter,
an associate professor of geography and lead of the Applied
Hydroclimatology Group at Dartmouth. Prior research has shown that
water is being extracted from the Ogallala Aquifer faster than it can
be replenished. "There's just not enough water to continue irrigating
at the current rate from the Ogallala, especially in the southern
portion where groundwater levels are rapidly falling," says Winter.
With greater warming, such as end-of-century under a high
greenhouse gas emissions scenario, heat stress will dominate impacts
on crop yields and reduce the effectiveness of irrigation as an
adaptation strategy throughout most of the U.S., especially for corn.
Corn typically has a higher yield than soybean, but soybeans are more
heat tolerant, don't require as much water, and have a slightly
shorter growing season.
"By the end of the century, our simulations suggest that it
will be more economically beneficial to irrigate soybeans than corn,"
says Winter. "Once irrigation is installed, we could see some places
that historically grew corn switch to soybeans because it's a low-cost
adaptation."
When it comes to irrigation, farmers must consider a range of
complex and competing factors: previous yield performance, crop market
values, energy costs, economic incentives, and seasonal weather
forecasts. The researchers hope that their analysis can be used to
help agricultural and water resource management policies in adapting
to a warmer climate.
More information: Irrigation
benefits outweigh costs in more US croplands by mid-century, Communications
Earth & Environment (2023). DOI:
10.1038/s43247-023-00889-0 , www.nature.com/articles/s43247-023-00889-0
Journal information: Communications
Earth & Environment
Provided by Dartmouth
College
Green Play Ammonia™, Yielder® NFuel Energy.
Spokane, Washington. 99212
509 995 1879
Cell, Pacific Time Zone.
General office:
509-254
6854
4501 East Trent
Ave.
Spokane, WA 99212
|